El mundo al instante

Virtual Surveyor drone surveying and mapping software has added new functionality that enables users to process larger projects without buying more powerful computers or cloud services, according to the company. This addition is one of several included in Virtual Surveyor 6.2.

“Our objective with Version 6.2 is to make our users more productive while saving them money by eliminating the need to invest in new hardware or processing services,” said Tom Op ‘t Eyndt, CEO of Virtual Surveyor in Belgium. “We have addressed the fact that drones are capturing more data at higher resolution, resulting in enormous files sizes.”

According to the company, Virtual Surveyor 6.2 solves the problem of large files by offering enhanced clipping and mosaicking functionality. The new version allows users to merge multiple smaller processed pieces of orthophotos and digital surface models into a single project and create smooth edges between these pieces with the new clipping tool. The mosaic can then be exported to a new tiff file or serve as the basis for a full area virtual survey.

In addition, Virtual Surveyor 6.2 offers a 3D Fly Through capability that allows users to select spatial bookmarks and waypoints in their scene and create a movie that allows the viewer to fly through the terrain in three dimensions.

Virtual Surveyor 6.2 also features improved surface handling for volume calculations. This feature was developed primarily for users who measure volumetrics of material piles in drone survey data. This capability makes it easy to represent topographies as triangles, contour lines or outlines without creating three different objects, the company said.

Other enhanced features of Virtual Surveyor 6.2 include a renumbering tool that allows users to select a set of times, features or geometries in the data set and automatically number them sequentially from any chosen starting number; concave hull extraction that allows users to select a section line to create a surface for a curved roadway; and boundary selection that allows users to trace around an unwanted feature and delete that object and all the points within it.

“The advantage of Virtual Surveyor is that it combines the interpretation skill of a professional surveyor with computing power to create standard survey products,” said Op ‘t Eyndt. “Surveyors can now accomplish more in Version 6.2 without expensive upgrades to other aspects of their workflow.”

Space Flight Laboratory (SFL) has launched three formation-flying HawkEye 360 Pathfinder 15-kilogram, 20 x 27 x 44-centimeter microsatellites designed to detect and geolocate radio frequency (RF) signals.

The target signals emanate from VHF radios, maritime radar systems, automatic identification system (AIS) beacons, very small aperture terminal (VSAT) communication systems and emergency beacons. HawkEye 360 applies advanced RF analytics to the data to assess suspicious vessel activity, survey communication frequency interference and direct search-and-rescue.

Precise formation flying is critical, as the relative position of each satellite must be known to accurately geolocate transmission sources. The satellites carry space-qualified GPS receivers and high-performance attitude control systems to keep them stable in orbit.

Flying in formation, two or all three satellites may receive the same transmission when it originates from their common footprint. The signal’s different times of arrival at each satellite and their different apparent center frequencies (Doppler) will enable onboard comparison of time-of-arrival and frequency-of-arrival measurements to then calculate the transmitter’s position.

The onboard GPS receivers provide precise estimates for the position and velocity of the receivers, information required for multilateration. The satellites further synchronize their clocks using GPS receivers, which also stabilize the phase-locked loops governing the tuning frequency in the RF tuners.

The satellites were built by Deep Space Industries of San Jose, California, and University of Toronto, Institute for Aerospace Studies/Space Flight Laboratory (UTIAS/SFL). They were launched in December 2018 into low-Earth orbit.

Past, Present and Future of Positioning

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Satellite surveying… are there any industry professionals out there not using it on (almost) a daily basis? Over the last 30 years, GNSS has become the main positioning instrument for most applications. Of course, there are still some exceptions where correct (relative) positioning is needed and dedicated optical systems such as a total station or level instrument are used, but even these are often set up over control points determined using GNSS techniques. This article investigates the developments in GNSS over the last decade and attempts to predict the future.

Around a decade ago, a review of GNSS systems would have entailed two types of systems. The most prevalent was the high-end RTK unit costing over €20,000, and the second type was the handheld GIS data collector. The main difference between them was their accuracy – centimetre versus (deci)metre level – and their antenna. The high-end systems all had a large antenna with an integrated receiver and separate controller that you had to mount on your survey pole, whereas the GIS types had a (small) patch antenna, receiver and controller integrated into a single unit. The only other type of system one could have were the machine control units for the construction industry; these were based on the same technology as the high-end RTK units.

Applications

All the above instruments are still used today. The high-end RTK system still looks the same but has come down in price. And, where the standard setup in the past would be two units connected by UHF radio, most brands now offer that just as a choice. The main connectivity comes from mobile data networks with corrections sent over the internet. Rather than supplying a similar unit as a base station, most manufacturers now offer what they call a network receiver capable of transmitting (and receiving) network corrections (Figure 1).

Another major development in GNSS receivers over the last few years is the integration of an ‘electronic’ bubble in the pole (Figure 2). Whereas in the past the pole had to be kept exactly upright for a correct position (and height) measurement, the modern receiver now has an integrated roll and pitch sensor like those in a smartphone. Using the readings from the sensor (and the antenna height), the position of the antenna is corrected towards the ground point up to an angle of 30 degrees. Based on this additional information it is possible to hold the pole at an angle and still obtain the correct position and height information. This not only makes accurate measurements easier; it also allows the surveyor to measure otherwise inaccessible points by positioning the pole at an angle.

Taking the use of freely available satellite-based augmentation system (SBAS) corrections and post-processing of earlier GIS data collectors a step further, this type of receiver is nowadays capable of receiving RTK corrections as standard, thus allowing the collection of GIS data to centimetre level rather than metre level. Also, GIS receivers increasingly no longer have an integrated controller but rely on any Bluetooth connected device such as an Android smartphone instead (Figure 3).

In addition to the receivers mentioned above, there are a multitude of small black-box RTK receivers designed specifically for use on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or ‘drones’) or for machine control (Figure 4). Often these have a large integrated memory allowing them to (also) store raw data for post-processing, giving even more accurate positions.

GNSS Constellations

About ten years ago, GNSS life was simple for the end user: it was pretty much GPS or nothing. Glonass, the Russian GPS equivalent (and the first to reach operational capability in the early 1990s), had deteriorated due to the economic crisis at the end of the 1990s. Glonass was revived a few years later, getting back to full operation about five years ago.

At the same time, although we all used GPS, another system was becoming ‘the talk of the town’: Europe’s Galileo. Set up as a public-private partnership in the early 21^st century, it was reshaped into a government-only (but still civilian) system. Although Galileo is not expected to reach full operational capability until sometime in 2020, the reception of Galileo signals already benefits positioning quality.

Last but not least, seemingly out of nowhere, has come BeiDou, the Chinese GNSS. It was initially set up as a regional system, but the Chinese were quick to start launching satellites. With 23 satellites in orbit (of which a considerable number are indeed regional), there is now full capability over central Asia and initial capability in the rest of the world. In other words, for those using their receivers in central Asia it is worthwhile to ensure that their system also has BeiDou reception.

System Developments

But it is not just the number of satellite systems that have increased from 1.5 GNSS to over four GNSS in the last ten years; developments within the systems have also taken place. On 24 December 2018, almost five years after the original plan, the first GPS-III satellite capable of new (and more accurate) positioning signals was launched. In 2020, the first launch of Glonass satellites with a full range of so-called CDMA signals is expected to bring the system onto the same signal basis as the other GNSS.

Whereas ten years ago a receiver with 80 channels would be considered technologically advanced, a modern receiver needs over 500 channels in order to optimally support all the signals from the four current GNSSs (Figure 5). After all, a single signal from a single frequency on a single satellite in a single GNSS accounts for a single channel in a GNSS receiver, and each GNSS has between 25 and 30 satellites in space, each broadcasting two to three signals on around three frequencies.

Correction signals and accuracy

Merely receiving signals from the four GNSSs does not give the professional user the required accuracy. Standard positioning from any of the four GNSSs alone (or combined) is at the metre level. However, for any modern job sub-metre accuracy is a common requirement. To achieve this higher accuracy, correction signals are needed. The most usual types of correction signals are the free-to-air SBAS such as the American WAAS or the European EGNOS. These signals, which are broadcast in many parts of the world from the various SBAS systems, can be received by all GNSS receivers, whether they are professional ones or inside a smartphone. SBAS corrections make it possible to achieve an accuracy of around one metre.

For those needing better accuracy, the standard correction signal to go to is real-time kinematic (RTK dGNSS or RTK). As a standard, all professional RTK receivers can run RTK GPS whilst most of them also support RTK Glonass corrections. No receivers currently offer more than joint GPS and Glonass RTK solutions, but manufacturers are looking into the addition of Beidou besides GPS and Glonass in the RTK solution. But even with ‘just’ two GNSS constellations being used in the RTK solution, the current accuracy is less than 1cm + 1ppm (68%) horizontal and 1.5cm + 1ppm (68%) vertical for most RTK-capable receivers. And with the modern network-type RTK, the 15km range limit of the early days with a single base RTK, has been replaced by the requirement to be within the virtual network and have internet connectivity.

The use of precise point positioning (PPP) is new to the land survey industry but has been common in the offshore surveying community for many years. With this technology, accuracies horizontal and vertical of sub-decimetre to the decimetre level are achievable at considerable distances from the base stations. Rather than SBAS and RTK (where the base stations are used for computing differential corrections), in PPP the base stations are used to find accurate corrections to the raw satellite position information. The roving receiver uses this information to compute an improved position, giving a first ‘convergence’ time of around 20 minutes. As the PPP correction signals are proprietary, not all receivers can use PPP correction signals (Figure 5). All PPP solution providers provide GPS corrections and some also work with a combination of the other available GNSSs.

Anti-jamming and anti-spoofing

Whereas a decade ago GNSS was a mainly a professional tool, apart from perhaps being an expensive consumer accessory for in-vehicle navigation, it is now integrated into many applications – principally as a positioning system but also as an accurate basis for timing. With ‘autonomous’ being the buzzword in the navigation industry, the reliance on both accurate and reliable positioning is increasing by the day. Where reliable positioning is needed, the challenge is not only to tackle weak satellite or correction reception, but also to avoid interference. After all, in view of the rising number of autonomous cars, drones and even ships, a GNSS outage anywhere could quickly lead to all sorts of potentially serious issues. It is relatively easy to ‘jam’ GNSS signals (causing loss of signal) because the signals are weak. This is not always intentional. A few years ago, a legal argument was fought out in the USA between LightSquared and the American GPS community over LightSquared’s proposed transmission network due to its interference risk. This illustrates the concern about GPS jamming. In the end LightSquared went bankrupt (and was recently refloated as Ligado with a GPS-friendly solution). Even more potentially dangerous is what is known as ‘spoofing’, in which the original signal is intentionally replaced by a stronger incorrect signal. Tests have shown that if this is done subtly, many receivers and applications will start to follow the incorrect signals, which could ultimately cause ships or aircraft to collide or military troops to be directed off course. To counteract these effects, industry-leading manufacturers such as NovAtel are not only researching anti-jamming and anti-spoofing solutions but are also introducing new antennas that are more resistant to jamming (Figure 7).

Into the future

Technology has clearly progressed over the past ten years. The main change has been from just one fully operational GNSS (i.e. GPS) towards four (almost) fully operational systems today. But other improvements have also been made. As a result, we will see receivers with more channels appearing in the market. For the next decade no radical changes are foreseen. The greatest change will be that of Glonass moving from the current FDMA signal structure to a CDMA structure interoperable with the other GNSSs.

On the technical side, receivers have changed too and – even more importantly – accuracy has been improved across the board, with RTK becoming the standard. Over the next decade we will see new systems bridging the gap between RTK and PPP allowing sub-decimetre-level positioning anywhere in the world and reducing initialization times from the current 20 minutes to a couple of minutes for the first start and to mere seconds after a loss of signal. One of the other changes that is hoped for is the introduction of the Galileo Commercial Service, not only as a free-of-charge PPP alternative but, perhaps more importantly, as a standard to facilitate interoperability of the current PPP solution providers’ PPP signals with any GNSS receiver. Lastly, we will see anti-jamming and anti-spoofing solutions becoming more available, with price levels coming down to the current levels of ‘standard’ equipment.

Unveiling the Findings from GIM International’s Annual Industry Survey

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Many providers of mapping and surveying solutions divide their potential customer base into vertical markets. Producers of GNSS receivers are targeting their products at professionals in agriculture, construction, surveying, mining and forestry, for example. The Lidar industry focuses on fields of applications including archaeology, corridor mapping and civil engineering as well as mining and – obviously – surveying. With so many hardware and software solutions for so many professionals in so many vertical markets, there must be a wide variety of user needs – but what parallels can be drawn between those various needs across the geomatics workflow as a whole? At 'GIM International', we investigated this thoroughly by analysing the results of our annual readers’ survey.

The term ‘geomatics’ encompasses a broad range of disciplines, including photogrammetry, remote sensing, land surveying, GIS and GNSS, as well as areas of experience such as Lidar, location-based services, cartography and image processing. But where are these disciplines used? In other words, in which sectors are our survey participants active? Most of the respondents (68.9%) indicate they are involved in land surveying, followed at a considerable distance by land management (32.5%), infrastructure (27.7%), building & construction (26.9%) and urban planning (24.1%). It is fair to say, however, that there is a degree of overlap between land surveying and the other areas.

Classifying geomatics professionals

Let’s dive a bit deeper to find out more about the geospatial professionals who participated in our survey. Who are they exactly? We asked them what best described their job title. 22.7% chose consultant as their answer, closely followed by researcher/academic (21.4%), with manager (17.6%) completing the top three (Figure 1). Geomatics consultants can be defined as mapping and surveying experts providing the full spectrum of surveying, monitoring, 3D modelling and imaging services to a wide-ranging client base. Many surveyors are working for consulting firms. AAM Group, COWI, Fugro and Woolpert are just a few well-known examples of consultancy companies that provide accurate and comprehensive surveying, mapping, geomatics engineering and 3D analysis services for civil engineering infrastructure and other projects.

The geospatial professionals working as researchers or academics are often employed at universities in the civil engineering (or similar) department or faculty, where they are involved in geomatics-related research and education. It is also worth mentioning the notably high representation among our survey respondents of geospatial professionals working as government officials.

Optimistic outlook for geospatial industry

In addition to gaining insight into the industry demographics, GIM International’s annual survey is also a good opportunity to measure the general business mood. We asked geospatial professionals about their expectations regarding the prospects in the surveying market in 2019 in comparison with the last three years. The outcome was very similar to last year’s poll: about 19% expect a much better business environment, while roughly 48% foresee some improvements. 26% expect the market situation to remain stable.

So the overall vibe is positive and optimistic, with the most promising perspectives stemming from the lively construction and infrastructure sector. This is especially the case in the likes of China, India and the Middle East, where numerous vast and prestigious projects for new cities, highways and railways are in full swing – with even more in the planning and development phase. Hence, the prospects look particularly good for companies involved in construction and engineering. However, it should be pointed out that there are some potential constraints. These are not unique to the geospatial industry; the widespread optimism in the surveying market is most at risk from geopolitical developments. International relations, the worldwide political order and potentially disruptive events can all have an impact on the global economic situation. How will Brexit play out, and how will it affect the economies of the European Union as well as the UK itself? Other regions to watch are the Middle East (will stability increase?), the USA (how will the economy develop?) and China (what will happen to the economic growth curve?). And on a global scale: will import tariffs and other protectionist measures become the new trend, or will the governments of the main economic powers scale back their intervention in the worldwide economy? All of these factors will have a direct influence on the geospatial industry.

Defining growth opportunities in geomatics

We asked our readers where they see growth opportunities for surveying in their current sector. This was an open-ended question, and close analysis of the answers reveals several interesting points. The most frequently mentioned sectors that offer growth potential for surveyors include land management, construction, infrastructure, urban planning and smart city projects. The application of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs or ‘drones’) for mapping and surveying projects in all kinds of areas is another clear growth opportunity, according to the survey.

One of the key pillars underpinning the widespread positivity among geomatics experts is the rapidly expanding need for 3D geodata, driven by the huge – and ever-growing – interest in the construction of 3D models of urban and built environments. This is obviously directly related to the countless large infrastructure and construction projects that are under way all around the globe. As one of the survey participants very aptly describes: “Entire cities all over the world will get their digital twin, and location will be the key for combining all sorts of data”. Indeed, geospatial data is the backbone of the digital replica of cities. This burgeoning demand for 3D geodata offers a wealth of new opportunities, in response to which many companies in the geospatial industry are heavily involved in innovating new digital mapping and rendering techniques (Figure 3). As illustrated by the vertical division of the customer base to focus on distinct fields of application, more and more companies are developing ever-more advanced geospatial tools to represent the 3D world in line with specific application-related needs.

The need for new mapping solutions

Last year, an astonishing 70% of the survey participants revealed that their organization was planning to invest in new systems. This figure has fallen slightly this year, but still shows a very positive outlook for manufacturers and developers of mapping and surveying solutions, with almost two-thirds of organizations intending to purchase new equipment and software – but which types of systems? UAVs are the clear winner: 45% of the geospatial organizations plan to invest in an unmanned aerial system (UAS) for mapping and 3D modelling, while a further 25% have plans to acquire a UAS-Lidar system. So the future looks bright for drone companies involved in the mapping and surveying field.

The drone has overwhelmingly succeeded in its mission to acquire a permanent place in the surveyor’s toolkit. The 2019 GIM International survey clearly indicates that the UAS has become an important instrument in the geospatial industry, just like total stations, GNSS receivers and – in various guises – laser scanners. In light of this, maybe the time has come to wonder why there are so many trade shows focused on UAVs. Perhaps it’s putting it a little bluntly, but imagine if professional surveyors were expected to attend events that only showcased the latest total stations, or that geobusiness delegates would visit an exhibition solely dedicated to terrestrial laser scanners… 

GNSS receivers remain crucial for surveyors as core devices for satellite positioning. Almost 45% of our respondents state that their organization is planning to spend money on such devices. As the workload for surveying professionals is likely to increase, the demand for GNSS receivers is obvious. There are so many different applications for GNSS receivers that we cannot list them all here, but the fields in which surveyors are involved in the geomatics industry (as outlined above) give a good general indication of their usage.

On the software side, about 35% plan to invest in point cloud processing software, closely followed by photogrammetry software – 30% of the organizations intend to obtain new photogrammetry software (Figure 4). In a previous GIM International survey, we asked geoprofessionals what they valued most about their chosen geodata acquisition method. Interestingly for providers of photogrammetric solutions, high accuracy topped the list of priorities (scoring more than 65%). This was closely followed by spatial resolution/point density (just over 50%). Processing software reliability came third with 33%, followed by aspects such as rapid availability of final products and a well-established workflow. These findings are echoed by the respondents in our latest survey.

The impact of new technology on surveying

At GIM International we strive to report on the state-of-the-art mapping and surveying solutions utilized by experts all over the world, so our annual survey is also an excellent opportunity to ask our highly valued audience which technology they believe is currently having the greatest impact on the surveying profession. In this case, instead of a ‘top three’ we have ended up with a ‘top four’: IT, robotics/autonomous vehicles, apps/mobile devices, and artificial intelligence (AI) are all regarded as technologies that will have a major impact on the geospatial business (Figure 5).

At the same time, it is also interesting to learn which trends our respondents foresee over the next five years. This will hopefully inspire suppliers of innovative mapping and surveying solutions to continue pursuing their R&D efforts that are set to change the professional surveying environment. In response, various ‘hot topics’ are mentioned, such as the integration of GIS and BIM, the increasing role of AI into geomatics (Figure 6), and the integration of systems and interoperability, but we also received some more future-oriented comments, many of which referred to the digital transformation. There is no doubt that digitalization is having an extremely disruptive impact, but is this also an advancement in every sense? One of the survey respondents sums up the sense of loss of ‘times gone by’ as follows: “I guess all these IT solutions will be the most important trend in the future, with less and less emphasis placed on traditional survey methods. Unfortunately, with this development, intuitive methods are slowly taken away…”. At GIM International we trust that the established companies as well as the ‘new kids on the block’ will help to prevent us from becoming too nostalgic. Ultimately, the adoption of high-end geospatial technology in many applications in wider society will open up a lot of new opportunities for tomorrow’s surveyors. This may make their work a little different from that of traditional surveyors, but probably no less exciting.